SEC Cracks Down On Confidentiality Agreements As Violating Whistleblower Rights And Protections

On April 1, 2015, the SEC announced its first filed, and settled, enforcement action against a company for using improperly restrictive language in confidentiality agreements as a method to stifle or retaliate against whistleblowers. 

In recent months, the SEC has been issuing requests to companies for copies of confidentiality agreements, non-disclosure agreements, employment agreements, severance agreements and settlement agreements entered into with employees and former employees of the companies.  The initiative specifically requests copies of documents since the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) and, in particular, the provisions of the Dodd Frank-Act which grant awards and protections for whistleblowers. 

In addition, the SEC has been asking for copies of company human resource policies, employee memos, training guides and any and all documents that discuss “whistleblowers” either directly or indirectly.  According to a Wall Street Journal article on the subject, the SEC believes that corporations are retaliating against potential whistleblowers and attempting to curb against the whistleblowing incentives in the Dodd-Frank Act by providing detriments to employment in contracts and policies veiled as confidentiality protections. 

The Dodd-Frank Act directly prohibits retaliatory conduct by companies.  The SEC has found the whistleblower statute to be extremely beneficial in uncovering and prosecuting large-scale securities fraud. In essence the whistleblower statute, and potential monetary awards for successful prosecutions, provides the SEC with an army of investigators well beyond what the agency could afford using its own resources.

The KBR Case

In the action filed on April 1st, the SEC charged KBR, Inc. with violating Rule 21F-17 under the Dodd-Frank Act.  In this case, KBR required employees participating in internal investigations related to potential securities law violations, to sign confidentiality agreements that prohibited the employee from discussing the matter with outside parties without KBR approval with a consequence of discipline or termination in the event of a violation of such confidentiality agreement.  As the investigations included allegations of securities law violations, the terms in the agreement were found to violate Rule 21F-17 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which specifically prohibits companies from taking any action to impede whistleblowers from reporting possible securities law violations to the SEC.  Rule 21F-17 is discussed in more detail below.

KBR agreed to pay a penalty of $130,000 and to amend its confidentiality statement to make it clear that employees are free to report possible violations to the SEC and other federal agencies without KBR approval or fear of retaliation.  This specific language inviting employees to report would likely have not been required if KBR had not had prohibitive language in the first place. 

In its press release on the matter, Andrew J. Ceresney, SEC Director of the Division of Enforcement, was quoted as saying, “By requiring its employees and former employees to sign confidentiality agreements imposing pre-notification requirements before contacting the SEC, KBR potentially discouraged employees from reporting securities violations to us, SEC rules prohibit employers from taking measures through confidentiality, employment, severance, or other type of agreements that may silence potential whistleblowers before they can reach out to the SEC.  We will vigorously enforce this provision.”

The SEC enforcement action came despite the factual conclusion that no employee had actually been prevented from reporting a violation to the SEC or had sought to do so.  The SEC is sending a clear message that any efforts to chill whistleblowers will be considered a violation of the rules. 

The Dodd-Frank Act Whistleblower Statute

The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July, 2010, added Section 21F, “Whistleblower Incentives and Protection” to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).  As stated in the original rule release and the SEC order against KBR, the purpose of the rule was “to encourage whistleblowers to report possible violations of the securities laws by providing financial incentives, prohibiting employment related retaliation, and providing various confidentiality guarantees.”

The bulk of the whistleblower statutes relate to the submission of original information leading to successful enforcement actions, and the calculation and payment of awards to the whistleblower.  The statute implements measures to protect the whistleblower from retaliatory actions. 

Rule 21F-2, “Whistleblower status and retaliation protection,” defines a whistleblower as follows:

(a)(1) You are a whistleblower if, alone or jointly with others, you provide the Commission with information pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 240.21F-9(a) of this chapter, and the information relates to a possible violation of the Federal securities laws (including any rules or regulations thereunder) that has occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur. A whistleblower must be an individual. A company or another entity is not eligible to be a whistleblower.”

(b) Prohibition against retaliation. (1) “[F]or purposes of the anti-retaliation protections…, you are a whistleblower if: (i) you possess a reasonable belief that the information you are providing relates to a possible securities law violation… that has occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur, and; (ii) you provide that information in a manner described in Section 21F(h)(1)(A); (iii) The anti-retaliation protections apply whether or not you satisfy the requirements, procedures and conditions to qualify for an award.”

Rule 21F-17, “Staff communications with individuals reporting possible securities law violations,” which is the subject of the KBR enforcement action, provides:

(a) “No person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation, including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement… with respect to such communications.”


In light of the recent SEC action and recent documentation requests, this firm has made particular modifications to its form of confidentiality agreements, non-disclosure agreements, employment agreements, severance agreements and employee settlement agreements.  In addition, we are reviewing existing forms used by our client companies to make the necessary modifications to avoid inadvertent violations that could result in an SEC enforcement action.  We urge all companies to seek the advice of competent counsel prior to entering into any such contracts, and of course, when conducting internal investigations which include allegations of potential securities law violations.  Additional enforcement actions are expected as the SEC continues to review documents requested and provided by various employer companies. 

Click Here to Print SEC Cracks Down On Confidentiality Agreements As Violating Whistleblower Rights And Protections- L&C SEC Cracks Down On Confidentiality Agreements As Violating Whistleblower Rights And Protections

The Author

Laura Anthony, Esq.
Founding Partner
Legal & Compliance, LLC
Corporate, Securities and Going Public Attorneys

Securities attorney Laura Anthony and her experienced legal team provides ongoing corporate counsel to small and mid-size private companies, OTC and exchange traded issuers as well as private companies going public on the NASDAQ, NYSE MKT or over-the-counter market, such as the OTCQB and OTCQX. For nearly two decades Legal & Compliance, LLC has served clients providing fast, personalized, cutting-edge legal service. The firm’s reputation and relationships provide invaluable resources to clients including introductions to investment bankers, broker dealers, institutional investors and other strategic alliances. The firm’s focus includes, but is not limited to, compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 offer sale and registration requirements, including private placement transactions under Regulation D and Regulation S and PIPE Transactions as well as registration statements on Forms S-1, S-8 and S-4; compliance with the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including registration on Form 10, reporting on Forms 10-Q, 10-K and 8-K, and 14C Information and 14A Proxy Statements; Regulation A/A+ offerings; all forms of going public transactions; mergers and acquisitions including both reverse mergers and forward mergers, ; applications to and compliance with the corporate governance requirements of securities exchanges including NASDAQ and NYSE MKT; crowdfunding; corporate; and general contract and business transactions. Moreover, Ms. Anthony and her firm represents both target and acquiring companies in reverse mergers and forward mergers, including the preparation of transaction documents such as merger agreements, share exchange agreements, stock purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements and reorganization agreements. Ms. Anthony’s legal team prepares the necessary documentation and assists in completing the requirements of federal and state securities laws and SROs such as FINRA and DTC for 15c2-11 applications, corporate name changes, reverse and forward splits and changes of domicile. Ms. Anthony is also the author of, the OTC Market’s top source for industry news, and the producer and host of, the securities law network. In addition to many other major metropolitan areas, the firm currently represents clients in New York, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach, Atlanta, Phoenix, Scottsdale, Charlotte, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Washington, D.C., Denver, Tampa, Detroit and Dallas.

Contact Legal & Compliance LLC. Technical inquiries are always encouraged.

Follow me on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google+, Pinterest and Twitter.

Download our mobile app at iTunes.

Legal & Compliance, LLC makes this general information available for educational purposes only. The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Furthermore, the use of this information, and the sending or receipt of this information, does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between us. Therefore, your communication with us via this information in any form will not be considered as privileged or confidential.

This information is not intended to be advertising, and Legal & Compliance, LLC does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this information in a jurisdiction where this information fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction. This information may only be reproduced in its entirety (without modification) for the individual reader’s personal and/or educational use and must include this notice.

© Legal & Compliance, LLC 2016

Copy of Logo

Our Score
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]